<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Lightning: Thunder 112 Warriors 104</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/</link>
	<description>For Golden State Warriors Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 00:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CURSE OF MULLIN</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>CURSE OF MULLIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Scott Brooks, quoted in the Chron, said all it took to win this game was for the Thunder to play 8 or 9 minutes of real defense in the 3rd Q.  That gave them a sufficient cushion to win the game.  I think he is exactly right.  Until we have players and coaches who play and demand good defense and rebounding, we aren&#039;t going anywhere.  We only have a problem in the 3rd Q bc we&#039;re not very good and that&#039;s when most good teams turn up the heat.  Nellie&#039;s defense is looking more PJ than Scott Brooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Brooks, quoted in the Chron, said all it took to win this game was for the Thunder to play 8 or 9 minutes of real defense in the 3rd Q.  That gave them a sufficient cushion to win the game.  I think he is exactly right.  Until we have players and coaches who play and demand good defense and rebounding, we aren&#8217;t going anywhere.  We only have a problem in the 3rd Q bc we&#8217;re not very good and that&#8217;s when most good teams turn up the heat.  Nellie&#8217;s defense is looking more PJ than Scott Brooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendlyMisanthrope</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendlyMisanthrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Disgruntled Broadside:

Surely this season there been at the very least an indirect relationship between W&#039;s players playing out position and getting hurt so much.   The problem: Nelson would rather lose his way, going small, than availing himself of the talent we have, namely a team that led the league in blocked shots last year.  Thus, he should have gone big this year: play at once AB, Turiaf, AND Randolph (who&#039;s really a small forward, a taller Tayshaun Prince, but with Lamar Odom ballhandling skills), let shot blocks and their threat generate fast breaks, and model the team  after the albeit more talented Denver Nuggests team of three years ago with Camby &amp; Andre Miller.  Having established that you can take out or slow down the other team from what the opposition  wants to do, THEN bring in your little guys and go nuts, change the tempo, play small ball. 

Nothing revealed the holes in Nelson&#039;s model then the Dubs&#039; losses to the woeful but talented Worst Teams in the league last year: Memphis, Oak City, Minnesota.   Wanna play non-structured ball? Wanna play small? They love it--because they can out-athlete you. 

Don Nelson=castles in the air.  It&#039;s all about his &quot;creativity&quot;, his reputation as an &quot;innovator.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgruntled Broadside:</p>
<p>Surely this season there been at the very least an indirect relationship between W&#8217;s players playing out position and getting hurt so much.   The problem: Nelson would rather lose his way, going small, than availing himself of the talent we have, namely a team that led the league in blocked shots last year.  Thus, he should have gone big this year: play at once AB, Turiaf, AND Randolph (who&#8217;s really a small forward, a taller Tayshaun Prince, but with Lamar Odom ballhandling skills), let shot blocks and their threat generate fast breaks, and model the team  after the albeit more talented Denver Nuggests team of three years ago with Camby &amp; Andre Miller.  Having established that you can take out or slow down the other team from what the opposition  wants to do, THEN bring in your little guys and go nuts, change the tempo, play small ball. </p>
<p>Nothing revealed the holes in Nelson&#8217;s model then the Dubs&#8217; losses to the woeful but talented Worst Teams in the league last year: Memphis, Oak City, Minnesota.   Wanna play non-structured ball? Wanna play small? They love it&#8211;because they can out-athlete you. </p>
<p>Don Nelson=castles in the air.  It&#8217;s all about his &#8220;creativity&#8221;, his reputation as an &#8220;innovator.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivrag</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I meant to add--

Good post, Feltbot. Again you explained things I didn&#039;t see, especially on defense.

I know we&#039;re all tired of this, but it is still somewhat interesting that in spite of all the shortcomings you list, they still got close. What I remember most the third quarter are a half dozen really bad turnovers that led to a dozen quick points. If the team just executes well for four quarters—

Team identity problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to add&#8211;</p>
<p>Good post, Feltbot. Again you explained things I didn&#8217;t see, especially on defense.</p>
<p>I know we&#8217;re all tired of this, but it is still somewhat interesting that in spite of all the shortcomings you list, they still got close. What I remember most the third quarter are a half dozen really bad turnovers that led to a dozen quick points. If the team just executes well for four quarters—</p>
<p>Team identity problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oregonguy</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregonguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-686</guid>
		<description>This is weird, being a &#039;D&#039; league showcase team.  Coby Karl looked good, better than expected, as has Tolliver and both Martin and Hunter looked at times like they could contribute at this level.

But standing back, it is hard to believe that ANY team could win ANY game with 2 or three &#039;D&#039; leaguers in the rotation.  Maybe this team is destined (doomed) for a top 4 pick no matter what.

On an aside, I notice 6&#039;10&quot; Mareese Speights is languishing on the bench in Philadelphia.  Any chance the &#039;W&#039;s have noticed and are working the phones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is weird, being a &#8216;D&#8217; league showcase team.  Coby Karl looked good, better than expected, as has Tolliver and both Martin and Hunter looked at times like they could contribute at this level.</p>
<p>But standing back, it is hard to believe that ANY team could win ANY game with 2 or three &#8216;D&#8217; leaguers in the rotation.  Maybe this team is destined (doomed) for a top 4 pick no matter what.</p>
<p>On an aside, I notice 6&#8217;10&#8243; Mareese Speights is languishing on the bench in Philadelphia.  Any chance the &#8216;W&#8217;s have noticed and are working the phones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMissBaron</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>IMissBaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-685</guid>
		<description>I thought I would try something different for once.  I decided to not watch the first half.  What is the point anyways?  So here I was stuck watching the 3rd and de ja vu...no adjustment, just crap.  The only thing meaningful was Coby Karl and his penetration and ability to dish.  This is how a PG is supposed to play and I hope Curry can watch some film and take some notes.  Yes I like Curry and I still have my hopes on his shoulders but in 1 game, Karl showed me a better ability to penetrate than Curry.  I can&#039;t stress this enough, but the Monta Curry backcourt cannot and will not work.  I know it is not entirely there fault, but you really can&#039;t have two skinny dudes defending the better guards in the league...and I dont even consider Russel Westbrook that good and look what he did.  Seriously what happens if the W&#039;s win the lotto, you HAVE to take John Wall and Monta will have to go.  I&#039;m ok with this season being a waste, because well it just is, but let us do something about the future...I&#039;m sick of Larry Riley&#039;s empty promises.  PS the Jackson for Vlad Rad just shows how pathetic the ability of management it.  GO W&#039;s but damn, it is getting seriously hard to watch the games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I would try something different for once.  I decided to not watch the first half.  What is the point anyways?  So here I was stuck watching the 3rd and de ja vu&#8230;no adjustment, just crap.  The only thing meaningful was Coby Karl and his penetration and ability to dish.  This is how a PG is supposed to play and I hope Curry can watch some film and take some notes.  Yes I like Curry and I still have my hopes on his shoulders but in 1 game, Karl showed me a better ability to penetrate than Curry.  I can&#8217;t stress this enough, but the Monta Curry backcourt cannot and will not work.  I know it is not entirely there fault, but you really can&#8217;t have two skinny dudes defending the better guards in the league&#8230;and I dont even consider Russel Westbrook that good and look what he did.  Seriously what happens if the W&#8217;s win the lotto, you HAVE to take John Wall and Monta will have to go.  I&#8217;m ok with this season being a waste, because well it just is, but let us do something about the future&#8230;I&#8217;m sick of Larry Riley&#8217;s empty promises.  PS the Jackson for Vlad Rad just shows how pathetic the ability of management it.  GO W&#8217;s but damn, it is getting seriously hard to watch the games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivrag</title>
		<link>http://feltbot.com/2010/01/31/no-lightning-thunder-112-warriors-104/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feltbot.com/?p=1226#comment-684</guid>
		<description>But give Nelson some credit for some creative coaching. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But give Nelson some credit for some creative coaching. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

